top of page

A new name is born - whip-sprickets

Jun 21, 2019
2 min read

We know that naming new organisms is critical for the study of biodiversity. Names allow us to more reliably communicate knowledge of species and other taxa.


Taxonomists regularly coin new scientific names based on Latin or Greek. Occasionally we'll also suggest a new common name so that non-scientists can share our discoveries more easily.


And just occasionally, a newly coined common name is so delightful, so sounding-as-though-it-has-always-been (or should-have-been), that it simply must be taken up into the dictionaries immediately. So it is with the beaut new name for the arachnid order Schizomida, just now given an entirely new vernacular name - whip-sprickets.


A whip-spricket, Draculoides vinei. Source: Harvey, M.S. (2013). Schizomids of the World, version 1.0. Western Australian Museum, Perth. http://www.museum.wa.gov.au/catalogues/schizomids

Whip-sprickets are usually small (5 mm or less) and not often seen. There are around 350 known species in the world. Australia, particularly the arid Pilbara region of Western Australia, is a centre of diversity. And the region is now even richer with the announcement, in a paper in the journal Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, that 56 new species have been discovered in the region by whip-spricket taxonomist Kym Abrams and colleagues from the Western Australian Museum.


Almost all of the new species spend their entire lives underground, where with other subterranean arthropods they make up the troglofauna. The story of the troglofauna is a remarkable one. After its breakup from Gondwana and during its subsequent drift northwards, Australia has changed from a wet continent with extensive rainforests to a dry continent with extensive deserts. And as the once-vast rainforests died out, many of the invertebrates - including whip-sprickets - that once lived amongst the litter on the forest floor became extinct. Some, though, went underground, and evolved into the species that Kym and colleagues have now discovered.


A specimen of one of the new schizomid species from the Pilbara. Image source: WA Museum.

Of course, these species are not just evolutionarily interesting and important. The Pilbara troglofauna, including the whip-sprickets, live in vugs (another great word) - the cracks and crevices in rocks, especially in orebodies. Many live in the iron ore deposits that support the region's vast export mining industry. Many are also short-range endemics, often restricted to a single orebody - and hence, a single mine-site.


The discovery of so many new whip-sprickets in the region provides essential knowledge to help ensure their conservation. The Pilbara's whip-sprickets are a remarkable testament to the persistence of life through millions of years of almost unimaginable global change. We need to understand their taxonomy and species diversity if we are to ensure their survival, after tens of millions of years of evolution, in the face of new global challenges.

7 Comments


wondimu2008
2 days ago

Industry-wide surveys are only as good as the operators who contribute to them, and this one draws on frontline media buyers to map where margins are actually coming from. If you want a structured look at profit structures and AI-era shifts, the Veryfb survey is worth reading before planning next year's budget.

Like

becca6
5 days ago

The point about names being what actually lets us communicate knowledge stuck with me: a species can be known for years and still be nearly invisible until it has a name. It makes you wonder how much biodiversity data sits unusable simply because the taxonomy hasn't caught up.


<a href="https://image2-5.org/

">image 2.5</a>

Like

becca6
5 days ago

I keep thinking about how a stable name changes the practical side of surveys: without it, records in field notebooks or biodiversity databases can’t be matched reliably across seasons. For something like whip-sprickets, even a working label would help volunteers and researchers compare sightings before formal description.


<a href="https://seedance2-5.org/

">seedance 2.5</a>

Like

becca6
5 days ago

The point about names letting us reliably communicate knowledge really lands when you're comparing field notes. I'd apply this by having volunteers log a temporary morphospecies label, then map it to the formal name once published, so survey data stays usable across seasons.


<a href="https://nano-bananapro.com/

">nano-bananapro</a>

Like

becca6
5 days ago

The point about names being necessary for reliable communication really stuck with me—without a stable label, every observation of a whip-spricket becomes hard to compare across studies. It makes taxonomic work feel less like admin and more like building the shared language ecology depends on.


<a href="https://nano-banana2.com/

">nano-banana2</a>

Like
bottom of page